Tuesday, May 02, 2006

9/11, ‘Middle-Ages Islam’ and Pogonophobia

September 11th 2001 has swept the world with its repercussions. Some consequences were blatantly obvious and some others were not.

There is no doubt that the global economy was hurt, that stock markets fluctuated and (after an eventual retaliation by the US in Afghanistan and Iraq) that oil prices soared to record highs.

There is no doubt that casualties were high, that families were destroyed and innocent people were heinously murdered.

It is safe to assume that the citizens of New York have been (to say the least) gravely and in essence permanently affected by the events.

The list goes on, the repercussions have affected the US’ foreign policy and placed its allies ‘on guard’ against Muslim extremism. This extremism continued to manifest itself by similar (but less dramatic) events such as the Madrid bombings of March 2004, the London bombings of July 2005 or those which have recently targeted Red Sea resorts in Egypt over the last 18 months.

9/11 was the magnum opus of Al Qaeda – par none. The organization’s devious schemes and master-mindful orchestrations have managed to send potent messages across the world – ‘Muslims are in a jihad (a misconstrued Holy War since the world jihad in Arabic literally means ‘struggle’) against the West.’ Osama Bin Laden and Ayman Al Zawahiri’s occasional audio and video messages sent through the Al-Jazeera network continue to ‘assure’ Western governments that threats remain imminent.

9/11 has also caused inconceivable damage to the Muslim world’s reputation. Prior to 9/11, those who had no image of Islam to paint are now able to convey a clear picture. One thinks of Islam, one thinks of violence, terror and backwardness. The phenomenon of the media and internet has contributed immensely to such a stereotype. Images of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and other areas of the region are convincing viewers that Islam still resides in the Middle Ages.

A common image televised or posted on the internet constitutes of a male wearing a turban, a long ghalabeya (white dress), holding a Kalashnikov and most importantly wearing a large beard – this is Militant Islam. Other images include all the above minus the Kalashnikov, alluding to non-violent Islam.

Such stereotypical images have pigeon-holed Muslims in to distorted and completely unrepresentative symbolism. However the more these images are portrayed, the more the stereotypes are reinforced.

What is peculiar is that 9/11 has exacerbated the interesting social phenomenon of Pogonophobia, the odd but existing fear of beards. As one’s mind associates his/her perception of individuals based on stereotypes (i.e. try thinking of a Mexican, an African-American, a Southerner or an Asian and write down the first connotations which pop in your mind), seeing males with large beards and conspicuous, suspicious and malice looking faces implies that they are Muslims extremists, possibly terrorists and violent.

The majority of Al Qaeda members (which have been the unfortunate façade of Islam) appear constantly in the media. In fact today, Pakistani authorities captured Mustafa Setmarian Nasar, a Syrian Al Qaeda fugitive who has been wanted for his involvement in the Madrid bombings as well as other terrorist acts during the 1980s in Spain. Not surprisingly, based on the image on the website, Mustafa wears a large beard and a turban – again reinforcing the image which has started to permanently etch in the minds of viewers.

Since Al Qaeda is an extremist Muslim group, they idolize the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) destructively. Growing one’s beard in Islam is a sunna and not a fard. In other words, it is NOT obligatory however it is a habit the Prophet used to maintain. A pragmatic explanation would be that the Prophet (PBUH) used to grow his beard because it was a hassle to trim/cut/shave it during his time (likened to the Middle Ages) – in fact it is probably as simple as that! Unfortunately, extremists have taken it upon themselves to abuse such a simple trait and somehow convert in to a social fear (so destructive) that it has led non-Muslims (as well as many liberal Muslims) to stereotype.

The exacerbation of Pogonophobia is certainly an interesting and subtle consequence of the horrific events of 9/11. As I’ve mentioned in a variety of my other posts, Islam needs a new face if it seeks to survive and mold in to the modern world. Individuals should be free to do whatever they please with their images (as well as grow their beards) however given this current social phenomenon, liberal Muslims should be careful with the rampant stereotypes floating around the non-Muslim and Western world.

6 Comments:

Blogger Rambling Hal said...

So what do you think the solution to this would be? Abandon, for example, the beard and turban altogether, disassociate from that completely? Do you think that's why, for example, the more liberal images of preachers like Amr Khaled are in vogue now, and appealing to the masses?

Targeted minorities or groups throughout history have been depicted stereotypically, whether African Americans, Hispanics, Jews, etc. They just put up with it, no?

How do you think this pogonophobia can be overcome?

And on a side note, I really liked this post, I learned a new word (pogono whatever) and I'm linking to it myself, in my own post. I can't resist, sorry! :)

4:58 PM  
Blogger The Egyptian Observer said...

@Rambling Hal. Thank for you for linking to my post. I am very glad you find my thoughts interesting, new and insightful. Pogonophobia is quite a unique and peculiar word as well as unique and peculiar phobia!

I read the comments made on your link to my post. I will address your concerns here and reply to other people on your post.

I believe that it is extremely important for individuals (Muslims in this case) to abide by their traditions and cultural ties. Most importantly to be 'free' to portray themselves in whichever way they please.

You and I are aware that Muslims who wear their beards long are following the Prophet's (PBUH) sunna. You and I are aware that Muslims who wear the galabeya and turban are wearing them because the weather is hot and it is more practical then Western jeans. You and I are aware that stereotyping based on imagery is ignorant, primitive and absolutely preposterous.

However this is you and I, educated, liberal and intelligent Arabs who are 'aware.'

Since Islam has suddenly become the forefront of many people around the world's attention, it is ONE'S duty to make sure that non-Muslims perceive Islam in the 'correct' way. However, like I said in the post, given the media's fixation on extremism and 'bad news' while refusing to sensationlize any positive news in the region, unfortunately Islam gets a bad name and a bad image.

Pogonophobia is a social phenomenon which would take a long time to overcome. One should not be tense when seeing a Muslim boarding a flight with a large beard and recall the evil atrocities of 9/11.

Such a primitive and ignorant assocation needs to be relieved. There is a reason why Amr Khaled has appealed to the masses.

Aesthetics do matter. Humans naturally attract to 'what looks good' and repel from 'what looks bad.' This saying is applicable to a variety of things: from choosing a significant other, to choosing the carpet you would like in your living room.

Amr Khaled is a clean cut, arguably 'moderate' Muslim who has portrayed a new face and association to Islam (this is of course subject to discussion since there has been quite a controversy on his preachings). He has been able to appeal to the masses because of his new perspective and new image. He has been able to target the Arab youth which are in those critical stages of 'searching.' Searching for the correct interpretation of Islam which they strive for.

History has certainly showed us that stereotyping is a method human minds use for categorization and perception. Jews, African-Americans as well as Hispanics around the world and in the US are also victims of such a seemingly innate feature of human subjectivity.

Fortunately none of them are associated with terrorism. The malice associated to any of them ranges from laziness, dishonesty and a stinginess with money. However, the stereotype of Muslims and Arabs has become fixated with extremism and violence.

I do not propose an abandonment of any traditions. However, I do propose an awareness of liberals like you and me and many others around the world who will serve Islam in generations to come.

Progessiveness, modernity, liberalism and non-parochialism is an absolute key.

9:08 AM  
Blogger Al-Hajeji said...

"A common image televised or posted on the internet constitutes of a male wearing a turban, a long ghalabeya (white dress), holding a Kalashnikov and most importantly wearing a large beard – this is Militant Islam. Other images include all the above minus the Kalashnikov, alluding to non-violent Islam."

Whats wrong with that? There is nothing wrong with following the sunnah (traditions) of our prophet (peace be upon him). Why do you think we wear the dish'dasha (white dress) - its because the weather is hot and we need to cool down, so this is the ideal dress, believe me jeans and jackets wont help you in weathers that are on average 30'C. If it was snowing everyday in the middle-east, would you think they would still wear the white dress? As for the beard, that too is tradition, my beard is not long though but I try my best ;) As for the "turban" well that depends on the regions, in afghanistan you find men with turbans, in the arab world, its mostly head scarves. As for the kalishnikov, that is common in afghanistan, wazirstan, sheeshan, somalia, yemen, sudan etc...Because its used as protection, not all villages have police stations!! That does not mean we are lawless, muslims are generally law abiding for example, stealing murdering etc, is forbidden and very rare, in fact this proves the point: You imagine in europe that a gang of criminals can posses the same weapons as the people who live in the middle east - just imagine the mayhem those european criminals would cause they'd be robbing every bank there is!
But it really doesn't matter! Everything is about what you are as a person, piousness comes from the heart, not what you wear! As a muslim I believe that there is no such thing as "moderate" or "extremist" in islam, it does not exist! And I believe that these terms are coined by western media, living in the UK, I read their papers and believe me, those editors don't have a clue! I do believe that if you are a practising muslim then you would always try your best to follow the five pillars of islam, enjoin the Good and Forbid the evil. What is a moderate anyway? Someone who has a muslim name, yet he drinks alcohol, he doesn't pay charity, he care more about his dogs than his fellow muslim, who loves to attack islam by the actions of individuals...is this what a moderate is? If not please explain to me. And an extremist; would he kill everybody who is not muslim? fasts every day, an expert making bombs and rockets? If not please explain to me.
Is Amr Khaled an extremist or moderate?

The author also states: "Images of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and other areas of the region are convincing viewers that Islam still resides in the Middle Ages. "

Iraq was a very prosperus and wealthy nation the only problem that country had was obesity and believe me, where I come from that means that is a good thing. Has this author ever saw the images of baghdad? And had he read how even after the iran-iraq war, iraq was still a nation considered wealthy! It was only after the UN sanctions on iraq, the economy cumbled and the death of more than ONE MILLION iraqi children proved how deadly these sanctions were. As for afghanistan, yes it is a very poor country, yet had this egyptian author ever thought of the fact that if the egyptian people had suffered 25 years of savage wars, would it still look so prosperous?

I would not label anyone a moderate or extremist, as I do not have that authority nor do I know what is concealed in their hearts. And so this topic of "muslim stereotypes" is TOO vague in my opinion.

4:22 PM  
Blogger The Egyptian Observer said...

@al-hajeji. There is ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with following the Prophet's sunna (PBUH), moreover there is certainly NOTHING wrong with following one's traditions.

This is not the discussion of the post.

You (as a Yemeni Muslim) have given me reasons that I (an Egyptian Muslim) am already aware. Like I told Rambling Hal, we are aware because we are exposed and we are not certainly not living in some ignorant bliss.

Let me give you a very simple definition of what I believe the difference between extremism and moderation. For one thing, the difference is inherent in the semantics of the words. In context, they refer to the interpretation of the Koran and Sharia Law. However, MORE IMPORTANTLY is the manner in which they are pragmatically implemented in society.

Would you place Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan in the same category as Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon?

Certainly not.

The social norms and conditions in the latter three countries is derived primarily (if not entirely) from a strict and extreme interpretation of the Sharia Law. I will not ramble on the rampant human/women's rights abuses in a country like Saudi Arabia but you certainly understand the picture.

Another difference between extremism and moderation refers to the absence/existence of open-mindedness and the absence/existence of any intellectual parochialism. Many people believe that Islam is completely absolutist, that one should NOT EVEN question their INTERPRETATION of the text, that it is BLASPHEMOUS to even consider critical thought. These are extreme measures which again have been indoctrinated in young Muslim children (in madrasas in Pakistan and homes in Saudi Arabia) and lays the seeds for the germination of today's militant Islam - violent, oppressive, wholly uncompromising.

I completely agree that everything depends on what you are as a person and in essence (as all Muslims believe) your business is between you and Allah at the end of the day. HOWEVER, humans are innately inclined to judge people on their aesthetics and they are inclined to stereotype and categorize.

Unfortunately, stereotyping Muslims is vague for you and me but NOT for the rest of the non-Muslim world. Given the current appaling circumstances, measures need to be taken to:

1) Disassociate Islam from violence and terrorism. (i.e. make people understand that wearing traditional clothes and a long beard DOES NOT MEAN that one is a terrorist)

2) Change its face (i.e. have liberal thinking, progressive and modern figures represent Islam such as Naser Khader a Danish Muslim MP check out http://www.khader.dk/flx/in_english/the_ten_commandments_of_democracy/ hold influential positions).

3) Slowly introduce ideas of modernity, progressiveness, critical thought and civility BUT WITH first undertaking social measures to improve all Muslim and Arab countries' standard of living before introducing a democracy compatible with Islam. (Check my post 'Democracy: Does It and Will It Work in the Middle East?')

Again, think about what you and me (as Muslims) understand and what others perceive. Unfortunately, in today's world, perceptions matter and the Arab/Muslim stance in the world is crucial and thus the 'CORRECT' image needs to be portrayed.

7:03 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hello EO, I received your email, will reply to it in a while... I have been an avid reader of ur blog for quite a some time now but this is the first time I drop a comment... You have my respect and admiration for your thoughts are very similar to mine indeed and I agree with you 100% ... Thank you for doing what you do and keep blogging... I just hope more non-Muslims read up your posts.

7:16 AM  
Blogger The Egyptian Observer said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/01/us/nationalspecial3/01traveler.html

Very pertaining to the discussion.

10:54 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

iopBlogs.com, The World's Blog Aggregator Blog Directory & Search engine